tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3711403820684618858.post7659121265601484255..comments2021-11-03T07:51:41.080-07:00Comments on Juridical Coherence: 15.0. A taxonomy of political ideologies based on construal-level theoryStephen R. Diamondhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07165258952900481659noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3711403820684618858.post-9761606882653484362013-09-02T21:50:08.922-07:002013-09-02T21:50:08.922-07:00I agree that he Managerialist.
He writes: "A...I agree that he Managerialist.<br /><br />He writes: "A people’s historic continuity of experience, says the conservative, offers a guide to policy far better than the abstract designs of coffee-house philosophers."<br /><br />I think ethos as a guide to individual conduct is near-mode. It has to do with immediately perceived personal sentiment.<br /><br />One thing creating potential confusion is that sentiment and analysis are both near-mode. They're different in many respects, but construal level abstracts from those differences.<br /><br />Any analysis of ideologies into types is abstract. But abstraction isn't Kirk's starting point.<br /><br />Stephen R. Diamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07165258952900481659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3711403820684618858.post-45745072516436895612013-09-02T04:32:59.641-07:002013-09-02T04:32:59.641-07:00Let's see if I get the categorization right fo...Let's see if I get the categorization right for a case. Russell Kirk advises adhering to convention as a principle: <br /><br />http://www.kirkcenter.org/index.php/detail/ten-conservative-principles/<br /><br />At first, I had thought his ideas on problems more abstract because of his comment on "the great demarcation of modern politics," but I would now rate him Managerialist because convention would be the opposite of abstraction, the opposite of claiming to know specific correct future courses of action or even problems--he favors "negation of ideology." Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com