kanBARoo court. Interlude 22. "Against routine public discipline."
Theory on framework issues
Friday, September 30, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- July (1)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- June (1)
- November (1)
- September (1)
- May (1)
- March (1)
- October (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- January (2)
- December (1)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- December (2)
- November (1)
- March (1)
- January (1)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (2)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- January (3)
- November (1)
Work Sample
About Me
- Stephen R. Diamond
- Joshua Tree, California 92252-2141, United States
- SUPPLIER OF LEGAL THEORIES. Attorneys' ghostwriter of legal briefs and motion papers, serving all U.S. jurisdictions. Former Appellate/Law & Motion Attorney at large Los Angeles law firm; J.D. (University of Denver); American Jurisprudence Award in Contract Law; Ph.D. (Psychology); B.A. (The Johns Hopkins University). E-MAIL: srdiamond@gmail.com Phone: 760.974.9279 Some other legal-brief writers research thoroughly and analyze penetratingly, but I bring another two merits. The first is succinctness. I spurn the unreadable verbosity and stupefying impertinence of ordinary briefs to perform feats of concision and uphold strict relevance to the issues. The second is high polish, achieved by allotting more time to each project than competitors afford. Succinct style and polished language — manifested in my legal-writing blog, Disputed Issues — reverse the common limitations besetting brief writers: lack of skill for concision and lack of time for perfection.
No comments:
Post a Comment